FEA 623: Mechanical Resistance of Filled Aerosol Packs

FEA 623 hydraulic test components including screw fittings, gaskets, and bottom-mounted pump connections on aerosol cans with observed valve leakage.

Standard Overview

FEA 623 is an industry standard issued by the European Aerosol Federation (FEA) that defines a simplified hydraulic test method to evaluate the mechanical resistance of filled aerosol packs fitted with a valve.

Unlike FEA 621, which evaluates empty containers, FEA 623 assesses the complete aerosol system:

  • Container (metal or plastic)
  • Valve and dip tube
  • Clinch or crimp interface
Key insight: FEA 623 evaluates the mechanical integrity of a sealed, functional aerosol pack.

Scope and Applicability

The method applies to:

  • Metal aerosol containers (tinplate or aluminium)
  • Plastic aerosol containers
  • Containers fitted with a valve by clinching or external crimping

The test is primarily intended for:

  • Product development
  • Design validation
  • Comparative system evaluation
Important: This is a development and assessment method, not a regulatory replacement for water bath testing.

Safety Warning

The test may result in:

  • Sudden bursting of the aerosol pack
  • Ejection of the valve assembly

Appropriate shielding and operator protection are mandatory.

Safety rule: Never perform FEA 623 testing without a protective screen.

Test Equipment

Schematic diagram of FEA 623 hydraulic pressure test showing filled aerosol container connected to a pump system with pressure gauge and bottom injection of water
Schematic representation of the FEA 623 test method showing hydraulic pressurisation of a filled aerosol pack via bottom connection and pressure measurement system

The test setup requires:

  • Hydraulic pump
  • Pressure gauge with maximum pointer
  • Minimum scale resolution of 1 bar

Test Preparation

The test sequence is as follows:

  1. A pump connector is assembled to the bottom of the container
  2. An aerosol valve with dip tube is clinched or crimped onto the container
  3. The container is completely filled with water at 20 ± 5 °C
  4. The container is connected to the hydraulic pump

All trapped air must be removed by applying a small pressure (approximately 1 bar) and actuating the valve with the container inverted.

Engineering insight: Residual air dramatically increases stored energy and invalidates results.

Pump Connector Configurations

Screw fitting components for aerosol container bottom connection including threaded connector, sealing gasket, and locking nut
Components of a screw fitting used to connect the hydraulic pump to the drilled container base, including connector, gasket, and locking nut
Assembled screw fitting mounted on aerosol container base showing internal and external views with sealing gasket compressed
Assembled bottom connection showing gasket compression and sealing interface on the aerosol container

Two pump connection methods are permitted:

  • Drilled bottom with tyre valve (internal components removed)
  • Drilled bottom with screw fitting and gasket

The hole diameter:

Must not exceed 9 mm in any case

Must not exceed 20% of the container diameter

Important limitation: The drilled hole weakens the container and must be kept as small as possible.

Test Procedure

After preparation:

Pressurisation continues until leakage or bursting occurs

The container is pressurised hydraulically

Pressure increase rate must not exceed 1 bar per second

Rule: Controlled pressurisation is essential for meaningful mechanical resistance comparison.

Observed Failure Modes

During testing, deformation or failure may occur at:

  • Valve cup or centre boss
  • Container shoulder or cone
  • Cylindrical body
  • Container bottom
  • Valve–container junction
Hydraulic pressure testing of filled aerosol container showing bottom pump connection and valve leakage during pressurisation
Hydraulic pressurisation of a filled aerosol container showing bottom pump connection (left) and leakage occurring at the valve under increasing internal pressure (right)
Comparison of aerosol container base before and after FEA 623 pressure test showing intact base with pump connector and ruptured base with radial crack and deformation
Comparison of container base before and after FEA 623 testing, showing intact bottom connection (left) and base rupture with radial crack under internal pressure (right)

Reporting Requirements

The test report must include:

  • Details of container, valve, and clinch/crimp method
  • Sample size
  • Pressure at which deformation occurs, by component
  • Leakage locations
  • Pressure at bursting or valve blow-off

Engineering Significance

FEA 623 provides a fast, comparative method to:

  • Evaluate container–valve system robustness
  • Compare alternative materials or designs
  • Identify weak points in assembled aerosol packs

It is especially valuable during:

  • New product development
  • Valve or container redesign
  • Supplier qualification
System insight: FEA 623 bridges the gap between empty-container testing (FEA 621) and filled-pack regulatory tests (FEA 606).

Relationship with Other Standards

  • FEA 621 – Pressure resistance of empty containers
  • FEA 606 – Water bath testing of filled aerosol packs
  • ADR / RID – Transport regulations
Download the Standard PDF

FEA 623 standard describing a simplified hydraulic test method used to evaluate the mechanical resistance of filled metal and plastic aerosol containers fitted with valves. It defines pressurization procedures to identify deformation, leakage, or bursting, helping assess container strength during product development and safety testing.

FAQ – Engineering & Development

No. It is a development and assessment method, used to support design decisions rather than regulatory approval.

Water eliminates variability from formulation behaviour and significantly improves test safety.

No. FEA 623 complements but does not replace regulatory water bath tests.

It allows controlled hydraulic pressurisation, but must be minimised to avoid distorting results.

The drilled hole alters container strength, so absolute pressure values must be interpreted comparatively.

CEO Pony
Pony Ma | CEO

With 25 years of experience in metal packaging and international business, we are dedicated to providing sustainable packaging solutions through innovative aluminum technologies. And I regularly share insights on material innovation and global sourcing strategies to help brands stay competitive.

Welcome to connect with me on LinkedIn to discuss the latest industry trends.

Social Share:

Contact us

Just fill the contact form with your requirements and we’ll get back to you within 24hrs.